ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed



I am not an expert, but I don't believe any external USB hard drive would be 
faster than an internal drive - I believe the internal drive would be 
significantly faster.

You might check it out at
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/ or
http://www.pcguide.com/ or
http://www.pctechguide.com/ or similar sites

Maris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <HMSDOC@aol.com>
To: <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:51 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed


In anticipation of obtaining Photoshop I was wondering about hard drive
speed.  In particular, I was wondering if getting a USB 2.0 card and an
external USB 2.0 Hard Drive would be significantly faster than working off of
a partition on my internal EIDE drive.  Don't know nearly as much as you
folks about hardware, so I hope this question is not a ridiculous one.  I
guess you will let me know if it is :>)

Howard
HMSDOC@aol.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.