ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.5 beta 9 Available


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.5 beta 9 Available
  • From: "" <EdHamrick@aol.com>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 06:11:00 EST
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

In a message dated 2/5/2002 4:28:58 PM EST, al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk
writes:

> Obviously, there is an issue with scanners like these which do a
>  separate IR pass.  However, given the the difference in IR focus (and IR
>  light source location) on all scanners with an IR channel, would there be
>  any benefit in doing some sort of registration check on ALL scanners
>  with an IR channel?

I tried it with my LS-30, but there was no misalignment found
on any image I scanned.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.