ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: nikon 4000 ED (ICE, Tmax, Kodachrome)





doogle@doogle.com wrote:


> Also, it is my understanding that ICE/FARE has trouble with KodaChrome not
> because of anything in the dye layers, but for fact that Kodachrome still
> contains a goodly amount of silver in the processed emulsion, unlike E-6 and
> C-41 processed films.


That makes a lot of sense based upon what I know about the Kodachrome
process, and some IR scans I've seen which are full of random tiny black
dots that were not surface dirt.

Art


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.