ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Polaroid SS4000, noise, and oversampling (was: VueScan 7.5 beta



On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 16:28:20 -0600  Eric (ericm@pobox.com) wrote:


> Why wouldn't oversampling and averaging help reduce hardware-caused
> noise?

It can be a pointless exercise. If the noise is down below the black point
of the image, you can just discard it by clipping the histogram. With
properly-exposed originals this is largely the case with the SS4000.

However if you want to increase shadow separation by editing the curve in
that region, or apply extreme gamma or contrast increases overall, you will
amplify the residual noise as well. In those circumstances multiscanning
might have something to offer.

Regards

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
& comparisons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.