ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Foveon





TonySleep@halftone.co.uk wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 02:48:18 -0800  Arthur Entlich (artistic-1@shaw.ca)
> wrote:
>
> > Once
> > production ramps up, the price per unit will drop and yields will likely
> > improve allowing for larger chips.  Also, there is no specific advantage
> > to a larger chip if the lenses are very good quality
>

Diffraction limitations begins take effect earlier with the design of smaller 
lenses
for a smaller format.

Kinderst regards,

Pat Cullinan, Jr.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.