ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Where can I actually *buy* an Nikon 8000ED?



> My experience is the same as Moreno's.  I've also never had a
> focus problem with either 120 or 35mm images.  I have only
> seen banding in certain very dense transparencies when I scan
> at 4000 per inch.  I often scan 120 at lower resolutions, and
> banding isn't a problem there.  It's easy enough to use the
> super fine mode when I need it.
>
>
>
> I've had banding on maybe a half dozen images out of hundreds
> scanned. When banding does show up, I simply scan with super
> fine mode enabled, and the banding is eliminated.


The focus problem can be quite subtle.  I only noticed it on a few
images before I got my other scanner.  After rescanning many images and
looking at the Nikon scans side by side with the new scans I saw the
extent of the issue.  It was pretty consistent with 120 negs.  I can see
the difference in big prints quite clearly.  It was one of those
situations where I did not know I had a problem until I had a good point
of reference.

Lawrence
http://www.lwsphoto.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.