ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?
  • From: "Tris Schuler" <tristanjohn@mindspring.com>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:22:35 -0800
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk


>Hello!
>
>On their site, and in their literature, Kodak extols the virtues of
>Supra for scanning. Does anyone have experience with this film? I like
>Fuji Superia a lot, but I do get some grain aliasing problems with the
>400 ISO, and VueScan doesn't have a profile for it <g>!
>
>I will shoot a few rolls of Supra this week, but it helps to have
>others' comparisons with emulsions I may not have seen yet.
>
>And then there is always Provia, which I love, but I want to use negs on
>my next trip.
>
>Les

I kind of like the look of Supra. Here's my most recent experience with
this emulsion, a medium-difficult night scene to catch with regard to latitude.

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=539820

Hope that helps.

Tris


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.