ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: New price on Flextight Photo in UK



Austin Franklin wrote:

>
> > I think you have done a good conclusion here. If you go back in
> > the mailing
> > list you found what I have been written about  film flatness problems .
I
> > did last summer a test with my own 3 scanners LS2000. LS4000 and
Polaroid
> > 35+ against Imacon Photo.
> > None of them could match the Imacon scanner in sharpness and Dmax.
>
> How do you know that any of the scanners weren't doing some sharpening on
> their own?  I'm asking if you confirmed that they weren't...  I would
> specifically suspect the Imacon did some sharpening...I don't know about
the
> others.


Austin

All sharpening was off, we double checked it to ensure an even test.  We
also turned it on to see the difference and, to be honest, the Flextight was
as sharp with sharpening turned off as the other two were with it turned on.
Turning sharpening on in the Flextight did produce absolutely stunning
scans, the best I have seen I think.

I have sent an email to Imacon to check that there is no hardware sharpening
being done without the being aware of it.

Simon

Simon

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.