ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: OT: bonehead print res Q



On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:00:27 -0800, you wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:18 +0000 (GMT), you wrote:
>
>>> Which is better a printer with 2880x775  resolution, or one with
>>> 2400x1200?
>>



I suppose I might have phrased the question badly, come to think of
it.  Maybe I should ask,   which is the better *resolution* spec,
notwithstanding other factors?  




>>The one that produces the output you like best. Sorry, I'm not being as
>>glib as that sounds, but DPI is a single variable among many, and far from
>>being all that important.
>
>
>Thanks Tony, I understand that, and don't take it as glib.  I've
>already told my friend to look at samples.  
>
>
>Ken
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
>filmscanners'
>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
>body

Ken Durling

Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/browse.php?id=photographer:203

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.