ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: New Polaroid Software


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: New Polaroid Software
  • From: "" <Bobgoldstein@aol.com>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:03:41 EST
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

FWIW, I have used Polacolor Insight's current dust removal and it works
well on the normal few specks on an otherwise clean piece of film.
Fortunately I am not trying to restore old negatives...

This is of course the current product (5.5) and not the new stuff in beta.


On 3/24/02 2:56 PM, filmscanners@halftone.co.uk said:

>From:  al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk
>Sender:    filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>Reply-to:  filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To:    bobgoldstein@aol.com
>There have been posts recently about the forthcoming software based
>dust removal utility from Polaroid which is currently in beta testing.  Now
>I'm assuming that the beta testers on the list are bound by non-
>disclosure agreements but I'm curious if anyone can comment on the
>following aspects of it:
>
>Defects.  ICE is good at not only removing dust but also scratches,
>fungus damage, watermarks etc.  Is the Polaroid software designed just
>to deal with dust or can it cope with a range of defects as well?  And
>(the big question) has anyone compared it side by side with ICE?
>
>Price/Compatability.  (One for David at Polaroid, I guess.) Is this going
>to be a standalone add-in which can be used on any scanner or is it
>going to be a "unique selling point" for Polaroid scanners only?  If the
>latter, is it going to be part of the standard upgrade path for Insight or is
>it going to be value added extra?
>
>
>
>Al Bond
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
>filmscanners'
>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
>or body
>
>
>----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
>Return-Path: <filmscanners-owner@halftone.co.uk>
>Received: from  rly-zd02.mx.aol.com (rly-zd02.mail.aol.com
>[172.31.33.226]) by air-zd02.mail.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id
>MAILINZD21-0324175654; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:56:54 -0500
>Received: from  wan-a-97.adsl.alcom.co.uk (wan-a-97.adsl.alcom.co.uk
>[212.47.80.97]) by rly-zd02.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id
>MAILRELAYINZD25-0324175643; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:56:43 1900
>X-Envelope-From: al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk
>Organization: greenspace.freeserve.co.uk
>Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:45:20 -0000
>Message-ID: <3C9E5700.30113.56798F@localhost>
>Priority: normal
>X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01)
>Content-description: Mail message body
>X-Envelope-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>X-UIDL: _BWC.vdln8.sulphur
>Sender: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>From: "" <al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk>
>Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>To: bobgoldstein@aol.com
>Subject: [filmscanners] New Polaroid Software
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.