ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Using Silverfast and Photoshop at the same time


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Using Silverfast and Photoshop at the same time
  • From: "" <argv@danheller.com>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 03:39:36 +0000
  • In-reply-to: filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk's message on Mar 26
  • References: <200203260003.QAA16982@danheller.com>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

well, the saga continues:

Reminder: I want to work on images in photoshop while Silverfast is
scanning [new] images from a batch session.

I found my silverfast disk and found that there is a TWAIN version
of the program in addition to the photoshop plug-in. However, it's
not clear what the difference is here. I can run the TWAIN version
from Photoshop exactly the same way, but it doesn't behave any
differently. Namely, I still can't run photoshop independently of
silverfast.  What is the functional difference between a photoshop
plug-in and a twain interface to the end-user? (Not that it makes
a difference in the context of my question.)

So, does silverfast have a way to use it as a stand-alone app like Insight?

--
        --dan

Photo Gallery:  http://www.danheller.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.