Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
- From: "Hemingway, David J" <HEMINGD@polaroid.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:32:10 -0500
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
The differences in the light source are really NOT exaggerated and it is not
a Nikon/Polaroid issue. It is a LED vs. Fluorescent/cold cathode issue.
I actually wondered that myself until I did the scans. At that time it was a
SS4000 vs. a LS2000 and there is a substantial difference in dust shown.
Using a LED light source also produces more contrasty scans. There are other
issues that many claim is caused by the LED light source.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Moreno Polloni [mailto:mp@dccnet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:34 PM
To: hemingd@polaroid.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
>>I'm sure that Digital Ice is great as it has so many passionate
advocates. I've never felt the need for it on my SS4000.
My workspace is not even close to a clean room. I take reasonable
care of my slides and negatives. I don't have to spend a lot of
time cleaning dust spots and scratches on my files.
I wonder if the different light sources and imaging paths on the
Nikon & Polaroid scanners account for some of the dust and
scratch sensitivities that their users encounter?<<
That's what some people say, and the Polaroid people like like to emphasize
this, but I think the differences between the light sources are exaggerated.
I try to use the best labs in town, but I still find occasional embedded
specs of dust, as well as the odd surface defect. Even if you maintain a
clean scanning environment, most people end up having to touch up the
majority of slides anyway.
I find that ICE is a real productivity tool. It does a very thorough job
without any negative consequences, other than additional scan time. ICE
processed images also have a smoothness that is very appealing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|