ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
  • From: "Hemingway, David J" <HEMINGD@polaroid.com>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:32:10 -0500
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

The differences in the light source are really NOT exaggerated and it is not
a Nikon/Polaroid issue. It is a LED vs. Fluorescent/cold cathode issue.
I actually wondered that myself until I did the scans. At that time it was a
SS4000 vs. a LS2000 and there is a substantial difference in dust shown.
Using a LED light source also produces more contrasty scans. There are other
issues that many claim is caused by the LED light source.
David

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Moreno Polloni [mailto:mp@dccnet.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:34 PM
To:     hemingd@polaroid.com
Subject:        [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000

>>I'm sure that Digital Ice is great as it has so many passionate
advocates. I've never felt the need for it on my SS4000.

My workspace is not even close to a clean room. I take reasonable
care of my slides and negatives. I don't have to spend a lot of
time cleaning dust spots and scratches on my files.

I wonder if the different light sources and imaging paths on the
Nikon & Polaroid scanners account for some of the dust and
scratch sensitivities that their users encounter?<<


That's what some people say, and the Polaroid people like like to emphasize
this, but I think the differences between the light sources are exaggerated.

I try to use the best labs in town, but I still find occasional embedded
specs of dust, as well as the odd surface defect. Even if you maintain a
clean scanning environment, most people end up having to touch up the
majority of slides anyway.

I find that ICE is a real productivity tool. It does a very thorough job
without any negative consequences, other than additional scan time. ICE
processed images also have a smoothness that is very appealing.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.