Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: digital ICE ?
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] RE: digital ICE ?
- From: "Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:05:02 -0600
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
I recommend you download the newest version of Nikon Scan. Some of the
correction algorithms have been changed slightly. I use NT 4.0 on this
workstation where I have an LS 2000 and I am forced to use NS 2.5. It seems
to work well for me but I haven't done a direct comparsion though.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-----Original Message-----
From: Op's [mailto:martin@wollongong.apana.org.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:44 AM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: digital ICE ?
Is there any difference between the dICE or performance - supplied with the
early Nikon
Scan say 2.1 and the later NS 3.1.2 - when using a Nikon LS2000 scanner?
Has it changed? Improved or stayed the same?
Rob
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
