Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Depth of Focus (was Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000)
Your looking for trouble my friend or an argument for it's own sake which,
if followed through, would soon depart from the question and it's inherent
purpose and fly off into the outer region of intellectual free space wherin
you no doubt wish to exist.
If that is your purpose then go there by all means but you will not find me
in pointless theory land and certainly I have no wish to see you further
inflate your already oversize ego.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <dickbo@btopenworld.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:32 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Depth of Focus (was Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid
SS4000)
> If you wish to have a perfectly flat surface then use a glass
> carrier
In a scanner, that brings up a whole other set of issues.
> The problem is depth of field by the way.
Why?
> Even if any given scanner could offer a suitable dofield the image will by
> any definition be distorted.
Er, and why?
Austin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
