Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
- From: "Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:33:12 -0600
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
Actually, the Nikon 8000 has a diffuse light source.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-----Original Message-----
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:14 AM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
> Yes, I have found the above to be true. While I was testing a
> Nikon 8000ED,
> I was totally blown away by how superb ICE worked with that scanner! I
> currently have the Minolta Scan Multi Pro on which ICE does a much poorer
> job!
But the Nikon "has" to have ICE to be competitive, as the light source
exacerbates scratches that would not even appear on a non-LED (diffuse light
source) scanner...
Austin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
