ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Re:Digital PIC




----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <krille@tin.it>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 6:28 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Re:Digital PIC



> However, I'm sure that you agree that a certain degree of flexibility can
> sometimes be useful... :-)

Not in a CCD that has to maintain coplainarity to a very small tolerance due
to very limited depth of focus!

Austin

--------------------------------------

Austin,

Should we then abandon film and go back to glass plates??? Or perhaps all
use the Contax III, which vacuum'ed the film to the pressure plate.

Anyway, I imagine that it would be quite a bit stiffer than film and held
firmly in place by the cameras pressure plate a.o.
But that is just my imagination as I have never seen the CCD itself or the
physical specs.

Preben

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.