Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Minolta Scan Multi Pro "Grain/ICE Test"!
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Minolta Scan Multi Pro "Grain/ICE Test"!
- From: "" <al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:59:36 +0100
- Content-description: Mail message body
- In-reply-to: <101772985301@wi.net>
- Organization: greenspace.freeserve.co.uk
- Priority: normal
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
David Soderman wrote:
> I made a few scans with the Scan Multi Pro.
> "With ICE" and "Without ICE" versions.
Having looked at your examples, I'd been interested to know whether
ICE clears up the damage even better when the negs are scanned in as
positives and then reversed/processed by Vuescan/Photoshop etc.
I know I've mentioned this before (in the context of the Minolta Elite and
Elite II) but, if the Multi Pro software works the same way, it's only when
you compared the two methods that you realise how much better ICE
works with positives. And although ICE shouldn't affect grain directly, it
might also have a bearing on how this looks as well.
Al Bond
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
