Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Scanning negs vs. slides
Tony,
As someone who works mainly with negatives rather than slides, have you
developed the ability to reverse negs in your brain? I find that I simply
cannot do this; I struggle sometimes to even tell what the image is, let
alone whether it is any good or not. Yet I once knew a photographic
technician who could just look at a neg and tell immediately whether it was
any good.
Does this come with practice and experience, or do you need brain
connections that I obviously do not have?
Bob Frost.
----- Original Message -----
From: <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk>
The major, major advantage of slide is that there's an immediate reference
right there, you can see what it should look like. For many people that's
so conclusive a USP that nothing else matters. For me, that is a
disadvantage! I'm generally photographing where slide's limitations, its
intrinsic contrast and restricted dynamic range, are a pain, and whatever I
get on slide is far away from what was there and what I want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|