ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: My Public Apology



That's just aging... our memory fades, not the prints ;-)

That, and the stuff we were doing human chemical trials on in the late
'60... ;-)

Art


TonySleep@halftone.co.uk wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:37:40 -0700  Tris Schuler
> (tristanjohn@mindspring.com) wrote:
>
>
>> Frankly, until the industry comes up with
>>some hard video standard we're all basically chasing our tails with
>>online
>>images and the critique of same.  It's good enough for casual purposes,
>>but
>>to get seriously critical with this stuff is silly at present. I wonder
>>why
>>so many do.
>>
>
> It's a personality defect, not a technology defect.
>
> I find one of the most alarming problems I face is brain calibration. EG I
> spend ages on a scan, getting it just right. A day or week or month later I
> look at it again, on the exact same kit where nothing objective has
> changed, and it looks completely, horribly wrong...
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Sleep


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.