[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS4000 Depth of field

["Peter Marquis-Kyle" <petermk@optushome.com.au>]

OK, I give up.


----- Original Message -----
From: "dickbo" <dickbo@btopenworld.com>
To: <petermk@optushome.com.au>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:35 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS4000 Depth of field


> My dear sir if an individual spent their entire life being concerned with
> negative possibilities as against first hand actualities, then they would
> most certainly have developed a substantial facial twitch.
>
> I do not have a facial twitch and I do not concern myself with that which
> has not yet been seen to happen.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Marquis-Kyle" <petermk@optushome.com.au>
> To: <dickbo@btopenworld.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:16 AM
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS4000 Depth of field
>
>
> dickbo discounts the problems of glass mounted slides deteriorating:
>
> > I have several carosel's here which contain glass mounted Kodachromes at
> > least 30 years old and nothing has happened yet. The worst that cane be
> said
> > is that every now and again it is necessary to re seat them in order to
> > remove newton rings.
>
> But there's a logical flaw in saying "I never saw it, so it doesn't exist".
> Storage conditions -- temperature, humidity, presence of fungal spores --
> will
> have an influence. I have seen enough mouldy glass mounted slides to take
> this
> issue seriously (I live in the sub-tropical zone). As to out-gassing, I
> would
> keep an ear open to what the conservators say.
>
> Peter Marquis-Kyle


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body