ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Printers




"Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>
1) Epson dye ink based printers always need good quality clay coated or
other specialized inkjet paper to provide the best quality result.  If
you are after a printer than gives best results with standard bonded
paper, the HP will win, but the inks are sometimes "Velvia"
oversaturated with better papers as a result.
<<<<<<<

Yup. The HP is over-the-top, and the Epson is under-the-top. The upper right
square on the GretagMacBeth color chart is electric cyan on the HP, subdued
on the Epson. Hopefully some sort of intelligent color management should get
the Epson a bit brighter.

>>>>>>>>>
2) If this printer is taking anything approaching 30 minutes for a 8 x
10 print, even at 2880 x 720 dpi, something is not properly configured.
  Normally, 1/2 to 1/3rd that time for a print of that nature.
<<<<<<<<<

It'll crank out an A4 with margins in 5 minutes or so, but it takes 25
minutes for no-margin prints. From reading the fine print, this seems to be
what it takes. Sigh. Oh well, it'll keep my printing costs down<g>.

David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.