ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: LS2000 Coolscan shadow noise issues getting worse?


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: LS2000 Coolscan shadow noise issues getting worse?
  • From: "Kapetanakis, Constantine" <KAPETAC@polaroid.com>
  • Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 11:17:05 -0400
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

I could be that the light source is deteriotating over time and the CCD is
trying to  compensate by increasing the gain. This of couse would be true if
you did not have streaks initially.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:anthony@atkielski.com]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:22 AM
To: KAPETAC@polaroid.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: LS2000 Coolscan shadow noise issues getting
worse?


> I'm fast coming to the conclusion (and
> concern) that indivdual elements in the
> CCD array (if that's what it is?) are
> deteriorating with time?  Is this feasible?

Possible, I suppose, but I've not heard of it before.  How many scans have
you done with the scanner?

You're sure the mirror and lens are spotless?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.