[filmscanners] Re: 3 year wait

["John Matturri" <jmatturr@earthlink.net>]

> > Scanning at 8000ppi native is less destructive than resampling in
> > Photoshop,
> > surely?
>
> Absolutely, providing the film has more to "give".
>
> Austin
>

Another factor is the grain aliasing that causes problems
with some 400 ASA negative films with some 4000 dpi
scanners. With more dpi to more fully resolve the grain you
might be able to avoid these interference patterns.
--
John Matturri
words and images: http://home.earthlink.net/~jmatturr/


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body