Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] OT - anal(ly) retentive...
> > T-Max 100 has a resolution rating of around 200 line pair/mm,
> that's over
> > 10k samples per inch, and would be a file of APPROXIMATELY FOR
> EXAMPLE SAKE
> > (since you are being anal about arithmetic ;-) ~10k x ~15k or
> ~150M pixels.
> >
>
> > Austin
> >
>
>
> The term Austin is looking for is "anally retentive"
Er, Arthur, I wasn't "looking" for any term. I used the "term" I wanted.
The common understanding, except for those who ARE really anal, is that when
someone says "anal" they are "abbreviating" the term "anal(ly) retentive".
What was your supposed point, BTW?
Austin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
