> >>is
> >>indistinguishable from the original, projected side by side at
> >>approx 6 feet wide.
> >>
> >
> > Understood, and I'd say you're probably %100 right, but that's projection,
> > which really doesn't allow for the most critical viewing. Now, not that
> > that doesn't work perfectly for some applications, that's not in question.
> >
>
>
> Yes, that can be the "rub"... If you are using Kodak projection lenses,
> you might as well be shooting through "Vaseline" coated lenses.
>
> I was amazed what I discovered in projection settings once I sprang for
> some Navitar Gold lenses. I have never quite understood this, quite
> honestly. We pay a minor fortune on top quality 35mm lenses for our
> cameras and then project the slide results with lenses from the "dark
> ages" (excuse the pun)...
Note that I also compared with loupe on light table.
Mac
Mac McDougald -- DOOGLE DIGITAL
500 Prestwick Ridge Way # 39 - Knoxville, TN 37919
doogle@doogle.com 865-540-1308
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
