ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: 3 year wait





Austin Franklin wrote:

> Arthur,
>
>
>>However, the reason the reference is "true pixel" is
>>because other than the new Foveon chip...
>>
>
> Well, no, scanning digital camera backs and cameras, and monochrome backs,
> also provide "true" pixels.
>
> Austin
>


Yes, of course, you are correct, but I think the discussion was
Ektachrome film, which is color, which precludes the monochrome, but
probably not the scanning back.

I assume the scanning back works like a scanner, with a moving tri-line
sensor for color work?  How long does it take to complete a scan across?
  I assume it is only to be used for "still life" subjects (or very
lethargic ones?)

Art

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.