ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait



> Austin,
>
> I am not familiar with the internal workings of film recorders to claim
> knowledge; but I have discovered that different 4K film recorders can have
> different size lights which effect the brightness and the amount of detail
> that the film recorder sensors can pick up - thus the actual effective
> resolution the recorder has.  I believe that the 4K figure is in
> LPI or line
> pairs not ppi;

Hi Laurie,

I believe it's neither LPI or PPI...but simply number of pixels of the
imager (on the long side).  The LIP or PPI depends on the magnification
(film format).  I do not believe that film recorders dither, halftone or any
of that either.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.