PC, Win98 original edition, 128MB Ram, latest Vuescan, it occurs usually after
a number,
though not a definite number, of scans.
The memory theory is quite attractive for me given that in two weeks or so I'll
be getting
delivery on a new computer with 1.5GB of RAM. This happens on relatively small
(20MB) files
but I don't release memory after every scan so I guess that could be an issue.
But if it's
apt to be a computer problem not a software problem at others are having I
guess it's best
just to hang in for a couple of weeks.
"Thomas B. Maugham" wrote:
> John:
>
> You haven't provided a great deal of information so it's hard to diagnose.
> Are you using a Mac or a PC? What version of the operating system are you
> using? How much memory do you have? How large is the swap file on the disk?
> What version of VueScan are you using? How often does this occur (i.e. once
> in a strip of 6 negs), when does it occur (i.e. the fifth neg in the strip),
> etc.
>
> On the surface it sounds to me like a memory problem in that you may not
> have enough memory to store all the scanned images and when it tries to
> write or read the information to or from the swap file on the disk it fails.
>
> I offer this as I use VueScan for both negs and slides and haven't seen this
> but I have 256mb of memory and a huge swap file on my disk so that may be
> the solution.
>
> Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of John Matturri
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:25 PM
> To: TMaugham@yahoo.com
> Subject: [filmscanners] vuescan problem
>
> Ever since I started to scan color negatives with vuescan
> (on SS4000) I periodically get scans that differ greatly
> from the preview. Usually with a much narrower range of
> values and odd casts, often a bright, almost solarized blue
> cast in white highlights and more recently an overall green
> cast. This makes batch scanning impossible because somewhere
> in the strip the scans eventually start having these
> properties. The only way to get rid of this behavior is to
> close down the program and rescan. I've raised the problem
> with Ed once or twice over the past few years but never got
> a solution. Except for these cases I like the scans I am
> getting so I put up with this but it is frustrating and
> time-wasting.
>
> Anyone else have this problem, or even better, have a
> solution to it.
>
> --
> John Matturri
> words and images: http://home.earthlink.net/~jmatturr/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
> or body
>
--
John Matturri
words and images: http://home.earthlink.net/~jmatturr/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body