ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon Coolscan 4000 ED



Perhaps that is the difference. I only scan negs.

Tom

Tom Scales wrote:

> I had an SS4000 and it with an LS-400 (4000ED).  The Polaroid is a better
> scanner.  Better shadow detail.  Crisper -- no depth of field problem.

I'd certainly agree on the depth of field but I didn't find the SS4000 had
very good
shadow detail (I'm talking slides here).  The shadows were blocked up, much
worse than my
old Minolta Elite even though both are 12 bit scanners.


Al Bond



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.