Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: opinions? Reviews? of Primefilm 1800 ?
> Depending on the current levels, so you have the devices original density
> range which, I would suggest is non linear in that for equal variations in
> illuminamnt you will not get a simlar variation in current except probably
> somewhere in the "middle" of the devices sensitivity range.
> At the highlight and shadow light levels the CCD will most likely be non
> linear, rather like film and paper emulsions.
Dickbo,
You can suggest that, but it's not true. Go take a look at some CCD data
sheet and check the linearity curve.
The Kodak 14400 has a linearity from 0-100% (35 electrons to 230,000) of
+-1%. It looks nothing like a film curve I have seen. It's simply a low
slope upward curve starting at 0 (with a little dip), going up to .6% at the
%50 point and back down to 0 at the %85 point and then going to -1 at the
%100 point.
> It is considered normal in electrical photo sensitive imaging devices, to
> assume that where random electrical noise equals image electrical
> output you
> will have reached the limits of image shadow response for any
> given imaging
> device.
> At the other highlight end where no further increase in current is
> generated. you have reached the upper limits of highlight reproduction.
> Please note we are talking negatives here baby doll.
That's all well and good, but that is very dependant on ILLUMINATION.
> Bit depth therefore is the same for any particular original
> intensity level
> except that where device response limits are reached at both ends of the
> illumination intensity scale, having say 12 bits or 48 bits per colour
> channel will not enable you to "see" any more visual information because
> there is non to see, at least not once the illuminant has been digitised.
That depends on the design of the scanner. Again, illumination intensity
AND exposure time play a very important factor in this.
> And that, as they say, is broadly how things work in digital imaging
> scanners.
VERY broadly...and loosely. There is a lot missing.
Austin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|