ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Density vs Dynamic range





> However my point is that if you can reduce the noise level then you can
> increase the number of steps (by halving the step size) with real
> benefit, but without altering the range.

Hi Peter,

Correct, but that INCREASES the dynamic range.

> My principle argument was that a 5000:1 ratio does not specifically define
> that 5000 steps are requires

Well, yes it does...that's what it means, with respect to what we are
talking about.  Go download a few linear CCD specs (or if you want, I can
mail you some), and you'll see they talk about it in exactly the same way I
do.

> Just a quick question - do CCDs really use a +/- voltage swing? I'd have
> thought that would have introduce noise problems around 0.

Not necessarily, but A/Ds do.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.