[filmscanners] RE: Is anybody there????

["Thomas B. Maugham" <tmaugham@yahoo.com>]

Oh no, I said I'll have to get creative, not dwell in the past! :)

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Todd Flashner
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:17 PM
To: TMaugham@yahoo.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Is anybody there????


Density vs dynamic range is always a good one. ;-)

Todd

on 7/8/02 5:33 PM, Thomas B. Maugham wrote:

> Okay, but next time there's a lull in activity I'll try to come up with a
> creative problem for the group to solve!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:45 PM
> To: TMaugham@yahoo.com
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Is anybody there????
>
>
> Don't be!  If you had not, we would be bored to death and have nothing to
> complain about. :-)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Thomas
>> B. Maugham
>> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:47 PM
>> To: laurie@advancenet.net
>> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Is anybody there????
>>
>>
>> Gosh, I'm sorry I started this!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
>> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:12 AM
>> To: TMaugham@yahoo.com
>> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Is anybody there????
>>
>>
>> There is a certain irony in this.  The thread is on low
>> traffic; so now to
>> make up for the low traffic, your response to my kidding (I
>> hope you did not
>> take my response as a serious suggestion) has come through
>> twice as two
>> separate responses as if to make up for the low traffic valume.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of
>> Anthony Atkielski
>> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 4:49 PM
>> To: laurie@advancenet.net
>> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Is anybody there????
>>
>>
>> That would be dishonest and unkind.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laurie Solomon" <laurie@advancenet.net>
>> To: <anthony@atkielski.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 16:28
>> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Is anybody there????
>>
>>
>> Come on Anthony, you can do better than that. The very least
>> you could do is
>> cause Thomas to think by giving him the paradoxical response
>> of "No." :-)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of
>> Anthony Atkielski
>> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 2:35 AM
>> To: laurie@advancenet.net
>> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Is anybody there????
>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Thomas B. Maugham" <tmaugham@yahoo.com>
>> To: <anthony@atkielski.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 02:27
>> Subject: [filmscanners] Is anybody there????
>>
>>
>> Is anybody there?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body