ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Nikon Coolscan



There's no reason why buying a scanner would make one need Genuine Fractals,
but it does imply involvement with digital imaging, and likely interest in
GF on the part of the buyer. Better than getting a toaster.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: David J. Littleboy
>
> I don't understand the point of GF in a scanner, although that may be
> because I'm scanning MF. It looks to me that scanned images are
> not as good
> (higher noise, lower sharpness) as digital camera images on a
> pixel-per-pixel basis. A 645 scan has 6000 x 8000 pixels or so, but my
> estimate is that it's only about twice (1.414 times linearly) as good as a
> 2000 x 3000 pixel D60 image. (4000 dpi scans of Provia look OK at 300dpi,
> but no better than 200 dpi prints of D60 images.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.