ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening



This is the method I use. I found that downsizing to
the final image size led to loss of detail but
sharpening with each 2x downsize maintained a lot of
it.  After the first sharpening, I only use 25-30%.

Warren

--- Anthony Atkielski <anthony@atkielski.com> wrote:
> I use a setting of 98 with 0.7-pixel radius and
> threshold of 2.  If you are
> downsampling, downsample in steps of 2x (half, half,
> etc., until you reach
> your final size) and unsharp mask with these
> parameters after each step
> (except the last, if it is substantially less than
> 2x).

=====
Warren Xato

For where to go when you know when
-PhotoDates-and-Places@yahoogroups.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.