ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!



> Comment: this went back and forth interminably, and I think most of that
> could have been avoided by actually quoting standard definitions
> of the term
> and working from there. It is a standard engineering term and it
> is not used
> in a nonstandard way in this context. Sigh.

Hi David,

You are right...but the problem is, there really isn't a "standard"
resource, I have found...yet, that really "defines" dynamic range...and
especially the terms...they are typically vague...like "largest" and
"smallest", which are ambiguous.

I tried to provide "standard" "terms" to be used, but...well...that didn't
work either.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.