ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!



I am trying to find my cyanide capsules... ;-)

Art


Austin Franklin wrote:

> Hi Arthur,
>
>
>>Based upon the "discussion" which occurred here recently regarding the
>>use of "density range", "dynamic range", etc., it seems fairly hopeless.
>>
>>Partially speaking, this is because there have not been agreed upon
>>definitions or standards within the industry.
>>
>
> Actually, that's not true.  They are VERY standard within certain specific
> engineering areas...unfortunately, it's marketing, and people who don't
> understand (and not all engineers...and people who have an engineering title
> but aren't really "engineers"...understand this...) this...
>
> I believe the term "density range" is quite strait forward...but I must
> admit, the  term "dynamic range" sounds a lot cooler ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Austin


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.