I use strength 100, radius 1, threshold 1 for the
Epson 2450 and next for every halving of image size
(linearly) 25 to 30 works well. If your scanner adds
its own sharpening, the initial value should be less
for strength. The fine detail just seems to bubble up
through the various downsizings.
Warren
--- "David J. Littleboy" <davidjl@gol.com> wrote:
>
> "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com> writes:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> Strength of 98, radius of 0.7, threshold of 2. Of
> course, this is a highly
> subjective setting. I do note that very small
> images usually require less
> unsharp masking than very large images to get
> visually similar results, but
> since the distinctions are small, I usually use this
> one setting for
> everything.
> <<<<<<<<<<<
>
> I find that the first sharpening, that applied to
> the image from the
> scanner, needs much larger strength and radius
> values than the second and
> later sharpenings. Do you turn on sharpening in the
> scanner?
>
> (I haven't tried that yet, since my experience with
> in-camera sharpening
> (consumer dcams) is that it has too low threshold
> setting and aggravates
> noise something fierce, but maybe scanner sharpening
> isn't so obnoxious...)
>
> David J. Littleboy
> davidjl@gol.com
> Tokyo, Japan
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk,
> with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as
> appropriate) in the message title or body
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
