ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: PS sharpening



Re sharpening:

What if the image is being prepared for a website? Of the three
steps--resampling to get the right size and 72 dpi, converting to JPEG
format and sharpening--what is the ideal order? Should sharpening still be
the very last step?

Stan

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 3:32 PM
To: snsok@swbell.net
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening


No, I don't.  You never know when you'll need an image _without_ sharpening
(remember, sharpening degrades image quality).


I don't like to sharpen images even before I get them into Photoshop.  I
prefer that the raw image be free of sharpening, so that I get as much
quality as possible in that raw image.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.