You're certainly correct Henk, thanks for pointing out to this fact.
Frankly, so far I didn't notice any visible artifacts caused by that which
is the reason I wasn't aware about the problem. Strange.
I tried 1600x1200, both monitor and graphics card handle this resolution
well, but the text is too small for my eyes (I'm glasses wearer) though
still discernable.
I'll try the former one (1280x960) instead.
Regards,
Alex Z
-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Henk de Jong
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:25 PM
To: alexz@zoran.co.il
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening
>I have my monitor usually set to 1280x1024,...
The display resolution of 1280 x 1024 has an aspect ratio of 5:4 instead of
4:3 like most of the others.
Photos displayed in this resolution will look squeezed. You better use the
resolution 1280 x 960 (or 1600 x 1200).
With kind regards,
Henk de Jong
The Netherlands
http://burma.wolweb.nlhttp://annapurna.wolweb.nl
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body