I think the two images were published in reverse order relevant to the
caption.
...Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com>
To: <rew@impulse.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 11:48 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Scanning with too much resolution?
(was:PSsharpening...)
I took a close look at those two horse images in the PDF file on page 280,
by magnifying the PDF as much as possible, so that the individual pixels
were easily visible as squares. What I found was that the image that he said
had been scanned at a higher resolution was actually rendered in the
document with exactly half the resolution. I don't know what's going on
here, but that's not a fair comparison.
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paul mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
> From: Julian Vrieslander
>
> It's from Dan Margulis' book "Professional Photoshop". A couple of the
> chapters are available on the web. Earlier in this thread, Preston Earle
> posted a link to one of them:
>
> <>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
