ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Slightly, somewhat OT



Sorry, I misunderstood the earlier post.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: Alex Zabrovsky
>
> Paul, I don't know where did you infer from about FireWire, but I was
> talking about USB2.0 remote storage.
> Contrary, my friend testing his FireWire device (similar to mine but run
> though IEEE1394 instead of USB2.0) got full throughput (about 35-37 MB/s)
> which means FierWire is fine delivering all it should to.
> My USB2.0 appears to slow things down more then twice for some reason.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.