ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening



On 8/22/02 6:16 PM, "al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk"
<al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> Julian Vrieslander wrote:
>
>> Then I started with the same original scan and downsampled in three steps,
>> halving resolution at each step, with bicubic.  After the first two
>> reductions, I applied unsharp mask, using Anthony's suggested settings.
>
>
> Maybe I misunderstood Anthony but I thought the (over) sharpening was meant to
> be applied
> BEFORE the downsampling to ensure that some elements of the exaggerated detail
> made it
> into the reduced image.

That's what I thought at first, but one of Anthony's messages seemed to
describe it as done AFTER each downsampling.

--
Julian Vrieslander <julianv@mindspring.com>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.