ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Dynamic range




"Julian Robinson" <jrobinso@pcug.org.au> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There's a large number of ways you can write down numbers to define a
range.  There is only one way in common use to express a range in a single
number that is independent of gain and other things that are irrelevant -
as a ratio.

You can express that ratio in a number of ways, dimensionless plain number
or as a log value etc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Does that mean you claim that density range and dynamic range are equivalent
measurements of the same physical quantity?

David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.