[filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion

["" <cameraman@xtra.co.nz>]

> If I Knew anything about running a list I'd start a "SCANNERS" list and have 
>two or three references - one as per Julian , one per Austin and one other. 
>People could choose who they wanted to believe. If this ongoing crap started 
>up it certainly would not be posted. Maybe they would then take their bitching 
>somewhere else and then leave the list for those of us who want to learn and
further the discussion about scanning.
> From: "JimD" <rasterdogs@attbi.com>
> Date: 2002/09/03 Tue AM 08:18:39 GMT+12:00
> To: cameraman@xtra.co.nz
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion
>
> At 08:37 PM 9/1/2002 -0700, Bruce wrote:
> >Please, enough already with the dynamic range argument.  I want to learn
> >about scanners.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >-bruce
>
> Bruce,
> You've made a common mistake.
>
> Once upon a time, scanners were the focus of this list.
> However, it has now become the domain for the all
> important discussion of DYNAMIC RANGE.
> The dynamic range storms tend to last for weeks but subside
> once a dead horse gets beaten to pulp.
> -JimD
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body