[filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion

["Bill Morse" <willym@bellatlantic.net>]

Hi Paul-

An unfortunate analogy, perhaps.  Whereas I "only" get to delete 1 or 2
Viagra ads a day, this list, like others before it, has recently been taken
over by an endless stream of going-no-where tit-for-tat back-and-forth,
involving only a few list members.  As in all of the similar diatribe and
counter- diatribe that I have had to delete from other lists, there is
little if any attempt by the participants to relate the discussion to
relevant questions of scanning.  As Laurie pointed out in the paragraph that
you omitted to quote.

Of course this " _is_ the place to discuss dynamic range with respect to
film scanners!"  It's the last part of the sentence that has not been
addressed, nor do the participants seem to be interested in addressing it.

Hence the call for them to take their argument off-list.

Bill Morse
PhotoProspect
Cambridge, MA 02139

on 9/2/02 10:39 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:

> I agree. This _is_ the place to discuss dynamic range with respect to film
> scanners. I don't think anyone can reasonably complain about it, as long as
> it's labeled as such in the subject line. It's no harder to hit Delete on
> something that says Dynamic Range in the subject than it is to hit Delete on
> something that says Get Your Viagra Now.
>
> --
>
> Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
> Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body