Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: FilmGet FS103
Hullo, one more Canon user here ;-)
As for Vuescan, I've seen a few "improved infrared with Canon FS4000" in the
notes for the last releases.
I've tried it myself and decided to keep going the hard way (i.e., raw file
without infrared cleaning, and then manual spotting) as there was a small,
but noticeable, loss in sharpness. YMMV (I scan and print only the very best
of my production, so I can afford to be picky and spend more time on each
photo)
That said, using FilmGet was *much* worse in any sense...
Alessandro Pardi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Franklin [mailto:franklin@shootingshark.com]
> Sent: lunedì 23 settembre 2002 04.41
> To: alessandro.pardi@inferentiadnm.com
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: FilmGet FS103
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 22:20:14 -0400, rylatt@attglobal.net wrote:
>
> > Thank you for my one and only response.
>
> No problem. I haven't noticed too many people "around here" talking
> about the Canon in the couple of months I've been monitoring the list.
> It just might be you and me. :-)
>
<skip>
>
> The last time I tried VueScan it didn't properly support the FARE
> scratch/dust removal of the scanner. I need to check hamrick.com to
> see if it's been fixed. When it supports FARE, I'll try it again.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
