ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: What can you advise?



Now Howard, I was trying to be discrete here ;-)

Art

hmsdoc@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated Thu, 26 Sep 2002 8:13:15 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
>artistic-1@shaw.ca writes:
>
>
>>I know of dozens of SS4000 and SS4000+ (and the Microtek equivalent)
>>scanner owners and I have only once had someone somewhat bemoan dust
>>problems, and this individual wants to have scans which show no defects,
>>even if these defects don't show on the print outs (last I
>>heard, he
>>still very much likes his SS4000+).
>>
>
>
> Being that someone (I think), I just thought I would  mention that with the 
>PS 7 healing brush any residual dust removal has been quite simple for 
>me...granted all my slides are 'new' and don't have severe dust or scratch 
>problems...just ordinary everyday type light dust.  It is now very quick 
>because you don't have to be so obseeive about choosing your clone spot as 
>anything that is vaguely similar as a source for the healing brush will nicely 
>remove the dust and blend in seamlessly unless it happens to be on an edge or 
>bordfer.
>
> Howard
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.