Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: FS4000
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: FS4000
- From: "" <HMSDOC@aol.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:21:38 EDT
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
Andre, I have used the FS4000 until recently, and now have a Polaroid SS
4000+. Unfortunately, I can't help you with the black and white film
question, as I have not scanned black and white on either machine. I can,
however, tell you that I find the Polaroid to have a lot less noise in the
shadows...not that the FS4000 was bad, but there was enough difference to
easily tell which machine did the scanning. I found both to have excellent
sharpness. The Polaroid scans quite fast (I have it on a firewire card). I
only used the FS4000 on a USB connection and it was extremely slow. Overall,
I am glad to have gotten the Polaroid, but the FS4000 was certainly worth the
money, as it is significantly cheaper.
Howard
> Is the Canon FS4000 suffering from noisy shadows with all type of films or
> is this problem apparent only with slides ?
>
> How would the original Polaroid SS4000 compare with the Canon FS4000 for
> scanning b&w negative: silver halide and chromogenic C-41 process films ?
> Thanks,
> Andre
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|