ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Avoiding Newton rings



If the only texture is behind the image, it would add grain, but at least it
wouldn't blur the image. I find that an anti-Newton slide mount, which has
textured glass on both sides, does blur the image a bit.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: Arthur Entlich
>
> I'm not sure I accept this statement.  If the texture is visible in
> scans, it would show up on either side, unless the depth of focus/field
> had a very fast drop off to limit the ability to have the texture in
> focus. With the surface of the anti-newton glass being literally
> contacting the film surface, I would expect any texture would be
> recordable regardless of which side it appeared on, relative to the
> scanning mechanism, being that the scan is a transmissive type, not
> reflective.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.