ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Compression


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Compression
  • From: "Tony Sleep" <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:19 +0100 (BST)
  • In-reply-to: <3DA49DDF.7000908@btopenworld.com>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:21:35 +0100  Bert Logan (bert_logan@btopenworld.com)
wrote:

> Still dont dare go near digital cameras - even after the
> recent claims made of 10Mpix+ CCDs being up to scanner
> capability - price/reality are in the way there.

Have a look at
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/1ds/1ds-field.shtml

I have some minor reservations about his comparison with film (posted to
Michael's web board), but not really about his conclusions. We are
now obsolete :) Unfortunately 7k GBP is impossible, but a few years will
see that spec at <$2k.

Regards

Tony Sleep - http://www.halftone.co.uk
Online portfolio & exhibit + film scanner info & comparisons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.